Showing posts with label Adam Smith. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Adam Smith. Show all posts

13.5.12

Philip Goodchild - Theology of Money - Duke University Press, Usa, 2008



Theology of Money is a philosophical inquiry into the nature and role of money in the contemporary world. Philip Goodchild reveals the significance of money as a dynamic social force by arguing that under its influence, moral evaluation is subordinated to economic valuation, which is essentially abstract and anarchic. His rigorous inquiry opens into a complex analysis of political economy, encompassing markets and capital, banks and the state, class divisions, accounting practices, and the ecological crisis awaiting capitalism.
Engaging with Christian theology and the thought of Carl Schmitt, Georg Simmel, Karl Marx, Adam Smith, and many others, Goodchild develops a theology of money based on four contentions, which he elaborates in depth. First, money has no intrinsic value; it is a promise of value, a crystallization of future hopes. Second, money is the supreme value in contemporary society. Third, the value of assets measured by money is always future-oriented, dependent on expectations about how much might be obtained for those assets at a later date. Since this value, when realized, will again depend on future expectations, the future is forever deferred. Financial value is essentially a degree of hope, expectation, trust, or credit. Fourth, money is created as debt, which involves a social obligation to work or make profits to repay the loan. As a system of debts, money imposes an immense and irresistible system of social control on individuals, corporations, and governments, each of whom are threatened by economic failure if they refuse their obligations to the money system. This system of debt has progressively tightened its hold on all sectors and regions of global society. With Theology of Money, Goodchild aims to make conscious our collective faith and its dire implications.

About The Author(s)

Philip Goodchild is Professor of Religion and Philosophy at the University of Nottingham. He is the author of Capitalism and Religion: The Price of Piety and the editor of Difference in the Philosophy of Religion and Rethinking Philosophy of Religion: Approaches from Continental Philosophy.






Preface to the U.S. Edition  xi
Introduction  1
Part. I. Of Politics  
1. Power  29
2. The End of Modernity  43
Part II. A Treatise on Money  
3. Ecology of Money  73
4. Politics of Money  123
5. Theology of Money  165
Part III. Of Theology  
6. Metaphysics and Credit  201
7. The Price of Credit  225
8. A Modest Proposal: Evaluative Credit  241
Conclusion. Of Redemption  257
Notes  263
Bibliography  281
Index  293



“Philip Goodchild is the most constructive and original philosopher of religion in the UK. . . . What Goodchild offers is both a critique of money and a theology of money, and part of what makes this book so fascinating is the significance of calling what he is doing here a theology of money as opposed to simply a critique of money. . . . Theology of Money . . . sketches a radical theological vision of credit that promises the potential for a future theology as well as a future humanity. . . . [Goodchild] provides vital resources of thought and capital for theological and practical human beings to put to work.”—Clayton Crockett, Journal for Cultural and Religious Theory
“Goodchild is to be commended for writing a political theology that makes a robust, concrete, and theoretically viable proposal for how to implement actual economic reform. Unlike most political theologies, this work is neither utopian nor separatist: it is not limited to a future eschatological kingdom, nor is it limited to the community of faith.”—David W. Congdon, Reviews in Religion and Theology
“Theology of Money by Philip Goodchild is a densely argued and multilayered treatise that excavates the theological power incarnated in the global monetary system. . . . There is a lot to learn from in this book.”—Review of Politics
“Goodchild’s work is a tour de force of conceptual analysis, engaging A. Smith and C. Schmitt among others, en route to arguing that theology must counter the conscription of time, attention, and demands made by money with its own vision of social existence.”—Myles Werntz, Religious Studies Review
“Goodchild has provided a powerful example of forgiveness as the creation of new value. His account of money puts great demands on our ability to think creatively about money and about value. His tremendously invigorating political, economic and theological proposals for transforming credit in society could produce many important and needed transformations. Such transformations are absolutely necessary if we are going to live in a world where life has many possibilities and people live their lives with wealth. . .”—Char Roone Miller, Theory & Event
“It is doubtful that many economists or bankers, those mechanics who tinker with the rates and ratios of the market machine, will read this book, which is to be lamented. Goodchild goes beyond such tinkering to ask what the machine is, why it does what it does, and how what it is doing should be evaluated. In this way his book stands in the tradition of thinkers such as Adam Smith, Karl Marx and John Maynard Keynes as they reflected on the nature of the good, the economic, and the political, extending their work through modernity to post modernity. Goodchild demands much of the reader, and these pages will not readily turn without a reasonable grasp of economics and philosophy, but the result is a profound and highly significant contribution to the understanding of money.”—Kent Van Til, Studies in Christian Ethics

“The power of the analysis, the energy of the text, the passions it excites in the reader, and its call upon us to think beyond the limits in which most philosophical, theological, economic, and cultural thought is enclosed make Theology of Money an indispensable book.”—William E. Connolly, author of Capitalism and Christianity, American Style
“Well written and very well researched, Theology of Money is a remarkable and very important book; there is nothing else like it currently in print. Philip Goodchild’s thesis is, in a way, startlingly simple: the universal sway of money exists instead of a universal sway of an ethics and a religion.”—Catherine Pickstock, co-editor of Radical Orthodoxy: A New Theology
Read more on DUV website

26.11.11

Oltre Marx. L'urgenza della de-proletarizzazione - Bernard Stiegler @ Kainos, nr. 11 (interview by Paolo Vignola)


Paolo Vignola: Ars Industrialis, l’associazione di cui lei è uno dei fondatori, ha pubblicato il suo secondo manifesto nel 2010 (il primo era del 2005), dimostrando un’attenzione politica encomiabile di fronte alla crisi planetaria attuale. In particolare, avete lanciato una proposta economica molto ‘‘filosofica’’ per uscire da questa situazione: l’economia della contribuzione, dei software liberi e della partecipazione civica. Inoltre, Ars Industrialis produce cultura – economica, politica, ma soprattutto ‘‘industriale’’ – attraverso seminari, riflessioni, assemblee e conferenze pubbliche, ecc. In altre parole, combattete l’ignoranza al di fuori del ‘‘regno dell’ignoranza’’, ossia all’interno di spazi che restano estranei ai territori della telecrazia – se non quando qualcuno di voi compare in televisione. In quest’ultimo caso vincere l’ignoranza diventa molto difficile. Come pensate allora di combattere l’ignoranza all’interno del suo regno?
STIEGLER: La risposta che ho dato in precedenza riguardava la televisione, ma disgraziatamente il regno dell’ignoranza ha incominciato a svilupparsi ben prima della televisione, attraverso la proletarizzazione. Ora, il programma di Ars Industrialis è ciò che chiamiamo la “deproletarizzazione”. Pensiamo infatti che oggi la proletarizzazione abbracci tutte le categorie sociali, compresa l’alta borghesia, perché per noi la proletarizzazione non è la pauperizzazione né l’impoverimento. Sovente la proletarizzazione può avere tali conseguenze e purtroppo oggi la pauperizzazione è una conseguenza massiva, ma la proletarizzazione è un’altra cosa. La proletarizzazione è precisamente la perdita del sapere, ossia l’estensione dell’ignoranza, la crescita dell’ignoranza. Essa si produce, secondo noi, innanzitutto per delle ragioni tecnologiche. Ciò significa che la proletarizzazione non è indotta dalla volontà di qualcuno, ma dal fatto che l’industrializzazione e lo sviluppo della tecnologia si producono essenzialmente attraverso l’esteriorizzazione dei saperi nelle macchine, negli strumenti, ecc. Così, lo sviluppo della tecnica comincia sempre con il corto-circuitare i saperi, ossia producendo proletarizzazione. Ed è questo ciò che vuol dire ‘‘proletarizzazione’’ nel senso principale che è stato utilizzato per la prima volta da Marx – ma che è descritto in modo più generale anche da Adam Smith. Noi pensiamo che per combattere questo processo di proletarizzazione non sia assolutamente necessario opporsi alla tecnologia, perché non crediamo che sia possibile opporsi alla tecnologia e all’industria; lo si può combattere, invece, sviluppando un altro rapporto con l’industria e la tecnologia. Da questo punto di vista siamo post-marxisti (lo stesso Marx pensava che fosse necessario impadronirsi dell’industria, e non opporvisi), poiché non utilizziamo la stessa logica dei marxisti, ma al tempo stesso riprendiamo alcune analisi di Marx. Possiamo prendere come esempio il software libero, perché si sviluppa come una nuova pratica della tecnologia che non si basa sulla distruzione dei saperi, ma al contrario è fondato sulla loro condivisione e sul loro sviluppo. Questo aspetto del software libero è stato compreso da molti, a cominciare dai pensatori italiani – Paolo Virno, per esempio, e molti altri che sono vicini a Toni Negri (io mi riferisco maggiormente a Simondon). Insomma, anche noi siamo vicini a chi, in Italia, pensa che il software libero porti in effetti a un nuovo modello economico e industriale in grado di svilupparsi parallelamente. Inoltre, noi pensiamo che tale modello sia generalizzabile, semplicemente poiché è razionale.