Showing posts with label Bataille. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bataille. Show all posts

18.1.16

Goldin+Senneby - Standard Length of a Miracle @ Stockholm's Tensta Konsthall, 27.1 - 15.5.2016

Goldin+Senneby - Standard Length of a Miracle



27.1–15.5 2016 Standard Length of a Miracle is a mutating retrospective by Goldin+Senneby. Over the past ten years, the Stockholm-based artist duo has explored virtual worlds, offshore companies, withdrawal strategies, and subversive speculation. In a unique and subtle way, they combine artistic practice, financial theory, and performative methods, which are sometimes borrowed from the world of magic. The retrospective will be presented as installations and performances at Tensta konsthall as well as at other places not primarily associated with contemporary art. Stockholm School of Economics, the Third Swedish National Pension Fund, the Financial Supervisory Authority, the clothing store A Day's March, Cirkus Cirkör, and the historical art museum Prince Eugen’s Waldemarsudde all serve as stages for reactivations of Goldin+Senneby’s oeuvre from the past ten years. Introducing the artistic field to public institutions and commercial centers enables a shift of perspective about where art takes place and who the audience is.

On view at Tensta konsthall is a new work developed in collaboration with the writer Jonas Hassen Khemiri. Khemiri’s meta-fictional response to Goldin+Senneby’s ten-year practice will be read out loud at the konsthall every day at 14.12. In the short story The Standard Length of a Miracle, the narrator changes his name to Anders Reuterswärd, hoping to increase his chances of getting hired at a konsthall. At a brisk pace without punctures or breathing space, the reader gets thrown into a stream of consciousness where all associations are equally important. The short story’s monologue is connected to the installation of an oak in the gallery space. The oak will function as a meeting place for discussions and seminars during the exhibition period, and, as the carpenter Moa Ott takes on the tree, new furniture will be produced around it. The tree refers to an oak that occurs in Khemiri’s text and also to the surrealist George Bataille’s secret society Acépahle, which is said to have gathered around an oak tree in the late 1930s. Acéphale—Greek for headless—has long been of interest to the artist duo and figures in their multi-year project Headless. Khemiri’s short story was published 10.1 in Dagens Nyheter. Link to the novel.

Economic and financial structures govern our lives increasingly. But, for most people, terms such as repo rates, tax havens, and derivatives are abstract and difficult to grasp. The artistic practice of Goldin+Senneby masters economic strategies and thus punctures the idea that this kind of knowledge is too complex to acquire. Instead of rejecting the financial sector, the artist duo borrows market-inspired methods in order to infiltrate and illuminate the consequences of our late capitalist system and its neoliberal approach. The retrospective highlights the precarious labor market of our time, the increased commercialization of the art world, and the new all-time highs and stock market crashes within financial economics.

Standard Length of a Miracle is a mutating retrospective, meaning it will appear in different forms in different cities. The first, in Stockholm, activates Goldin+Senneby’s history thorough connections between their works and various institutions and activities in the city. Additional mutations are scheduled for Brisbane, Paris, and New York.


Headless



What do a fishy offshore company, secret artists, a ghost writer and French philosophy have in common? No connections are inconceivable in the recently published thriller Headless. The novel is published by Tensta konsthall, Triple Canopy (New York) and Sternberg Press (Berlin) and forms the final phase in a nine year-long performance on state sovereignty, surveillance and strategies for withdrawal, initiated by the artist duo Goldin+Senneby.

Headless captures the reader with a delirious flight through the slippery corridors of offshore business, seen through the eyes of the British ghost writer, John Barlow. He goes out to find an elitist, Bataille-inspired secret society in the Bahamas/…/, obsessed with sacrifices. The society seems capable of anything in order to retain its power and position.
 
Clandestine money transfers to exotic islands is a highly debated phenomenon. Terms like  "tax havens" and "offshore" are also widely known, both connoting faraway dreamy places in tropical settings. A utopia for savvy swindlers. But what if this model of thought is instead applied to a different kind of island life, picturing withdrawal as a strategy. This is something the philosopher and writer Georges Bataille suggested already in the 1930s.


The Swedish release of Headless took place at a secret location in Stockholm on the 20th of May. The release included a conversation between Mara Lee, author of e g. the novel, Future Perfect and the thesis, När andra skriver (2014) and Rasmus Fleischer, historian and researcher (Stockholm University), appearing as one of the characters in Headless. The conversation was moderated by Maria Lind, director of Tensta konsthall.
 
Headless is a sneak peak of Goldin+Senneby's retrospective at Tensta konsthall, scheduled for February–May 2016.
 
Past Headless releases:
4.9, Salt Beyoğlu, Istanbul.
Respondents: Ismail Ertürk (cultural econimist), Övül Durmusoglu (curator), and Kaya Genç (writer). Moderator: Maria Lind.

14.7, Manchester Business School, Manchester.
Respondents: Nikolai Ssorin-Chaikov (social anthropologist), Liz McFall (sociologist), Ed Granter (organisational studies), Peter Folkman (venture capitalist)
Moderator: Ismail Ertürk (cultural economist)

27.6, Miss Read Art Book Fair, Berlin.
Respondents: Hito Steyerl (artist) a.o. Moderator: Caleb Waldorf.

28.5, Librairie Le Monte-en-l'air, Paris.
Respondents: Dominique Gonzalez-Foerster (artist), Emilie Notéris (writer), Christian Chavagneux (economist). Moderator: Sandra Terdjman.
 
26.5, Open School East, London.
Respondents: Ned Beauman (writer), Angus Cameron (economic geographer), Nicky Marsh (literary scholar). Moderator: Andrea Phillips.

13.5, Triple Canopy, New York.
Respondents: Katie Kitamura (writer), Jill Magid (artist), Joseph O’Neill (writer), Mary Poovey (Professor of English). Moderator Alexander Provan.

2.4, Tranzit, Prague.
Respondent: Fedor Blaščák (philosopher/curator/activist)
 
1.2, LA Art Book Fair, Los Angeles.
Respondent: Bill Maruer (anthropologist) a.o.
  
More to be confirmed.

20.4.12

Ontologies of the Present: Dialectics and Genealogy from Hegel to Agamben - directed by Bram Ieven and Geertjan de Vugt @ Utrecht University (March/May 2012)




Ontologies of the Present: Dialectics and Genealogy from Hegel to Agamben
OSL Seminar directed by Bram Ieven en Geertjan de Vugt 


When Foucault famously declared Sartre’s Critique of Dialectical Reasonthe last book of the 19th century the bell for the burial of Hegelian historicism was tolled. Foucault’s turn to Nietzsche and his revitalization of genealogy as critique can only be understood in opposition to the Hegelian dialectic. While the dialectic provides a method in which the singularity of thought is recuperated and placed within a larger ‘whole’ (Hegel) or process of unification (Sartre), genealogy shows us how the origin of certain modes of thinking and discourses are not recuperable within a bigger whole (Foucault) and are in fact shot through by a multiplicity that does not let itself become part of any straightforward process of unification (Deleuze).
            However, both dialectics and genealogy are ways of coming to terms with the double bind one finds oneself inevitably confronted with when dealing with the idea that concepts, ideas and critical notions relate to the historical, political and social circumstances in which they are developed. On the one hand it implies that thinking is coached in its own, singular historical conditions, affected by them and shaped through them. On the other hand it implies that thinking itself also directly reflects on history and its own historicity. The idea that thinking should reflect on its own position, the idea that his is what thinking is about, is what the modern concept of critique is all about. The dialectic and genealogy, then, are two ways in which critique can be defined.          
            This seminar is based on three pillars. Firstly participants will familiarize themselves with the dialectic (Hegel, Kojève, Sartre), it’s criticism (Nietzsche, Deleuze, Bataille), and its persistence (Jameson, Malabou). Secondly we will study genealogy as a critical method by focusing on the work of Foucault and his interpretation of Nietzsche. The development of genealogy as a (alternative) form of critique, it turns out, was conceived of as a direct criticism of Hegel and the dialectical method. Finally we will go into one of todays most prevelant reinterpretations of Foucault, namely that of Agamben’s analysis of paradigms.
            By the end of the seminar participants have a thorough understanding of the concepts vital for an understanding of (French) post-structuralist thought: dialectics and its relevance today, the stakes of a philosophy of difference, genealogical analysis and the archaeology of paradigms.
Each seminar session takes place on Friday from 2 to 5PM. For each session a special guest speaker will be invited who will be giving a one hour introduction to the theme after which we will do a close reading of the texts under scrutiny. Reading materials will be distributed in advance. Please register by sending an e-mail to: osl-fgw@uva.nl
Program:
1. Historicity and Dialectics
Friday March 16 2012, 14:00-17:00, PC Hoofthuis 6.25 (Spuistraat 134) CHAIR: t.b.a.
G.W.F. Hegel, ‘Preface: On Scientific Cognition’ in: Phenomenology of Spirit, Oxford University Press: Oxford, pp. 2-46.
Alexandre Kojève, ‘In place of an Introduction’ and ‘A Note on Eternity, Time, and the Concept’ [Selections] in: Introduction to the Reading of Hegel. Lectures on the Phenomenology of Spirit, New York, Basic Books, 1969, pp. 3-29, pp.
Jean-Paul Sartre, ‘Critique of Critical Investigation’ in: Critique of Dialectical Reason, London: Verso, 1991, online:
http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/sartre/works/critic/praxis.htm

2. The Eternal Recurrence and the Critique of Dialectics
Friday March 30 2012, 14:00-17:00, PC Hoofthuis 6.25 (Spuistraat 134) CHAIR: Rudi Visker
Friedrich Nietzsche, Genealogy of Morality, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1994, pp. 1-68. 
Gilles Deleuze, Nietzsche and Philosophy, London, Continuum, 1986, pp. 87-88, 156-164, 194-198. 
Michel Foucault, 'Nietzsche, genealogy, history', in: Language, Counter-Memory, Presence, Ithaca,
Cornell University Press, 1977, pp. 139-165.
Michel Foucault, 'The Discourse on Language’, in: The Archaeology of Knowledge, New York,

Pantheon Books, 1972, pp. 215-239.

3. The Return of the Dialectic?
Friday 13 April 2012, 14:00-17:00, PC Hoofthuis 6.25 (Spuistraat 134) CHAIR: Marc de Kesel
Fredric Jameson, ‘Hegel’s contemporary critics’, in: Valences of the Dialectic, London, Verso, pp. 103- 122.
Catharine Malabou, ‘Whose afraid of Hegelian wolves?’ in: Deleuze: A Critical Reader, P. Patton ed., 114-138.
Judith Butler, ‘Foucault: dialectics unmoored’ in: Subjects of Desire: Hegelian Reflections in Twentieth Century France, New York, Columbia University Press, 1999,
Jeremy Gilbert-Rolfe, ‘Nietzschean critique and the Hegelian commodity, or the French have landed’, Critical Inquiry, Vol. 26, nr. 6, pp. 70-84.

4. Genealogy from Nietzsche to Foucault
Friday April 27 2012, 14:00-17:00, PC Hoofthuis 6.25 (Spuistraat 134) CHAIR: Sjoerd van Tuinen
Friedrich Nietzsche, ‘On the Use and Disadvantage of History for Life’ in: Untimely Meditations, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1997, pp. 57-87, 100-107.
Friedrich Nietzsche, ‘341. The Heaviest Weight’ in: The Gay Science, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2001, pp. 164-165.
Friedrich Nietzsche, ‘The Convalescent’ in: Thus Spoke Zarathustra, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 173-181.
George Bataille, ‘Mr. Nietzsche’ and ‘Nothingness, Transcendence, Immanence’, in On Nietzsche, London, Continuum, pp. 1-12, 177-178.
Gilles Deleuze, Nietzsche and Philosophy, London, Continuum, 1986, pp. 25-31, 47-49, 68-72. 
Gilles Deleuze, Difference and Repetition, New York, Columbia University Press, 1994, pp. 53-58.
Pierre Klossowski, ‘The Experience of the Eternal Return’ in: Nietzsche and the Vicious Circle, London, Continuum, 2005, pp. 43-57.

5. From Foucault to Agamben
Friday 11 May 2012, 14:00-17:00, PC Hoofthuis 6.25 (Spuistraat 134) CHAIR: t.b.a.
Michel Foucault, The Archaeology of Knowledge, New York, Pantheon Books, 1972, pp. 135- 199.
Giorgio Agamben, Remnants of Auschwitz, New York, Zone Books, 1999, pp. 138-146.
Giorgio Agamben, ‘Philosophical Archaeology’, in: The Signature of All Things, New York, Zone Books,
2009, pp. 81-113.
Giorgio Agamben, ‘What is the Contemporary?’, in: Nudities, Stanford, Stanford University Press,
2011, pp. 10-20.
Giorgio Agamben, The Sacrament of Language, Stanford, Stanford University Press, 2011, pp. 8-11.

6. Agamben’s Genealogy of the Present: Homo Sacer
Friday 25 May 2012, 14:00-17:00, PC Hoofthuis 6.25 (Spuistraat 134) CHAIR: Sonja Lavaert



Giorgio Agamben, ‘What is an Apparatus?’ in: What is an Apparatus?, Stanford, Stanford University Press, 2009, pp. 1-24.
Giorgio Agamben, ‘What is a Paradigm?’ in: The Signature of All Things, New York, Zone Books, 2009, pp. 1-24

Giorgio Agamben, Homo Sacer, Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1998, p.1-15, 119-189